المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6105 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر
تنفيذ وتقييم خطة إعادة الهيكلة (إعداد خطة إعادة الهيكلة1)
2024-11-05
مـعاييـر تحـسيـن الإنـتاجـيـة
2024-11-05
نـسـب الإنـتاجـيـة والغـرض مـنها
2024-11-05
المـقيـاس الكـلـي للإنتاجـيـة
2024-11-05
الإدارة بـمؤشـرات الإنـتاجـيـة (مـبادئ الإنـتـاجـيـة)
2024-11-05
زكاة الفطرة
2024-11-05

هاملتون دائر قاسي
15-2-2022
كون الله تعالى خير محض ينافي خلق بعض الحيوانات الضارة
15-11-2016
الشفاعة
11-08-2015
صفات المتقين / قرة عينه فيما يزول
2023-11-04
الاختصاص
21-10-2014
تشابه التواليات Sequence Similarity
22-1-2020

Some implications for psycholinguistic theory  
  
233   08:47 صباحاً   date: 2024-08-23
Author : CHARLES E. OSGOOD
Book or Source : Semantics AN INTERDISCIPLINARY READER IN PHILOSOPHY, LINGUISTICS AND PSYCHOLOGY
Page and Part : 521-28


Read More
Date: 2023-04-19 696
Date: 2023-04-14 1000
Date: 2024-08-27 175

Some implications for psycholinguistic theory

Most linguists and many psycholinguists, convinced by Chomsky’s review (1959) of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior (1957) and Fodor’s critique of neo-behaviorism’s mediation models (1965, 1966) that contemporary learning theories are incapable ‘in principle’ of handling language behavior, have been looking elsewhere for a ‘ more powerful ’ theory of performance. Not finding anything else of interest in psychology, it was natural to turn to generative grammar itself not only as a theory of language competence but also as a model for a performance theory as well. This approach has proven quite sterile, as Chomsky himself (1961) predicted it would: ‘ The attempt to develop a reasonable account of the speaker has, I believe, been hampered by the prevalent and utterly mistaken view that a generative grammar itself provides or is related in some obvious way to a model for the speaker’ (1961, footnote #16). Not only can it be easily shown that any contemporary generative grammar is itself incapable ‘ in principle ’ of handling language performance, but I have tried to demonstrate elsewhere (Osgood, 1966, 1970) that Fodor’s critique of representational mediation theory is untenable.