المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6137 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
القيمة الغذائية للثوم Garlic
2024-11-20
العيوب الفسيولوجية التي تصيب الثوم
2024-11-20
التربة المناسبة لزراعة الثوم
2024-11-20
البنجر (الشوندر) Garden Beet (من الزراعة الى الحصاد)
2024-11-20
الصحافة العسكرية ووظائفها
2024-11-19
الصحافة العسكرية
2024-11-19

معنى كلمة كمّ‌
14-12-2015
Voicing
16-7-2022
مناهج البحث في جغرافية المدن - المنهج الايكولوجي
16/9/2022
حساسية لجوز الصنوبر Pine Nut Allergy
20-8-2019
 المصادر والتعرض والتأثيرات
2-2-2016
الرد على احتجاج الخليفة الاول
13-3-2019

Some implications for psycholinguistic theory  
  
300   08:47 صباحاً   date: 2024-08-23
Author : CHARLES E. OSGOOD
Book or Source : Semantics AN INTERDISCIPLINARY READER IN PHILOSOPHY, LINGUISTICS AND PSYCHOLOGY
Page and Part : 521-28


Read More
Date: 2024-01-01 674
Date: 2023-04-19 815
Date: 2023-11-01 701

Some implications for psycholinguistic theory

Most linguists and many psycholinguists, convinced by Chomsky’s review (1959) of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior (1957) and Fodor’s critique of neo-behaviorism’s mediation models (1965, 1966) that contemporary learning theories are incapable ‘in principle’ of handling language behavior, have been looking elsewhere for a ‘ more powerful ’ theory of performance. Not finding anything else of interest in psychology, it was natural to turn to generative grammar itself not only as a theory of language competence but also as a model for a performance theory as well. This approach has proven quite sterile, as Chomsky himself (1961) predicted it would: ‘ The attempt to develop a reasonable account of the speaker has, I believe, been hampered by the prevalent and utterly mistaken view that a generative grammar itself provides or is related in some obvious way to a model for the speaker’ (1961, footnote #16). Not only can it be easily shown that any contemporary generative grammar is itself incapable ‘ in principle ’ of handling language performance, but I have tried to demonstrate elsewhere (Osgood, 1966, 1970) that Fodor’s critique of representational mediation theory is untenable.