المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6109 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر
تربية الماشية في جمهورية مصر العربية
2024-11-06
The structure of the tone-unit
2024-11-06
IIntonation The tone-unit
2024-11-06
Tones on other words
2024-11-06
Level _yes_ no
2024-11-06
تنفيذ وتقييم خطة إعادة الهيكلة (إعداد خطة إعادة الهيكلة1)
2024-11-05

سايتوكينات Cytokines
2-1-2018
الشيخ درويش علي بن حسين بن علي
9-8-2017
المال مصيدة إبليس
14-2-2021
Independent Set
16-1-2022
Reference
23-2-2022
الإنتاج الحيواني - التوزيع الجغرافي للمصائد في العالم - مصائد المياه العذبة
9-6-2021

Spelling  
  
491   10:19 صباحاً   date: 2024-05-10
Author : Magnus Huber
Book or Source : A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
Page and Part : 852-47

Spelling

Simo Bobda (2000b: 188) observes that an <o> spelling may trigger /ɔ/ in words like love, cover, ton, or honey. This is also illustrated by Speakers A and B’s /ɔ/ pronunciation of some and its compounds – the GhE convention. But at the same time there are also instances where the pronunciation does clearly not follow the spelling, such as done, nothing, or other, all /a/ in the recording. As such, these do not invalidate Simo Bobda’s theory since it allows for /a ~ ɔ/ variability when there is an <o> spelling. Note however, that a number of words, such as come, are never pronounced with an /a/ in GhE but always with an /a/ even though they are spelt <o>. A psychological factor may explain the /a/ in cases of these high frequency words: it has repeatedly been observed that Ghanaians believe their English to be nearer to the British standard and thus “better” than other West African varieties. In Ghana, /kɔm/ is stereotypically associated with Nigeria and is frequently pointed out as one of the differences between Ghanaian and Nigerian English. The categorical /a/ in words of the come type may thus be an attempt by Ghanaian speakers to dissociate themselves from the “bad” Nigerian accent. In addition, Speakers A and B’s /ɔ/ in drug, understand, results cannot be explained by spelling pronunciation. These observations certainly weaken the usefulness of the factor orthography.