المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 6109 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر

Hendrik Antoon Lorentz
25-2-2017
أحكام نقدية ترتبط بالكم
22-3-2018
Carbonyl Group Polarization
18-10-2019
أهم عناصر المناخ التي تؤثر على النظم الحيوية - التربة
21-3-2022
Sadi Carnot
9-12-2015
Interpersonal Pragmatics Conclusion
26-5-2022

CajVE vowels  
  
532   11:33 صباحاً   date: 2024-04-02
Author : Sylvie Dubois and Barbara M. Horvath
Book or Source : A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
Page and Part : 410-24


Read More
Date: 2024-03-20 540
Date: 2024-04-19 435
Date: 2024-06-12 387

CajVE vowels

We summarized the CajVE vocalic system. The phonetic inventory of CajVE is similar to Southern English. However, CajVE speakers do not prolong stressed vowels and diphthongs.

Glide absence in FLEECE, FACE, GOAT, GOOSE is typical of CajVE. Their nuclei do not fall or become fronted as in Southern English. The nuclei of KIT may rise but CajVE speakers lower the DRESS vowel in words such as Texas, bed, red, better, well and egg to [æ]. Consequently the words bed and bad sound the same, although the word bed, pronounced [bæ] has a shorter length than the word bad pronounced [bæ:]. Although CajVE shows the PIN/PEN and THOUGHT/LOT mergers, upgliding forms of THOUGHT, BATH and DANCE occur irregularly. By contrast, monophthongization of PRICE, PRIZE, CHOICE, FIRE, MOUTH, and POWER is prevalent. The non-rhotic aspect of CajVE can also be observed in NURSE, SQUARE, NORTH, FORCE (the last two are merged), CURE, and lettER. Like Southern English, the happY and horsES vowels are pronounced [ɪ], and commA as [ə]. Like the old white Southerners, CajVE speakers do not merge POOL/PULL, FEEL/FILL, FAIL/FELL. However, the vowels in MARRY/MERRY/MARY are usually identical, but those in TOMORROW/ORANGE may be distinct.

 

CajVE provides an interesting case of shared phonetics with the dialects in its geographical region while maintaining a distinctive coherence as a separate dialect. The distinctiveness of CajVE is initially revealed quantitatively. Where comparisons can be made, the patterns of variability are not the same in terms of linguistic conditioning in each generation of speakers. Moreover, the actual rate of use of the features often far exceeds the results reported for Southern English varieties. When the scope of the variability is widened to include more data, i.e., the widespread deletion of all final consonants and the glide absence, it becomes clear that CajVE is qualitatively distinctive as well from Southern English, and especially American English.