Reflection: Anaphoric and other referring expressions – their variation across English written registers

Biber et al. (1998: chapter 5) explore the usage of referring expressions, particularly anaphoric expressions, across different registers, using the corpus-based methodology (see also Biber et al. 1999: 237–240, for similar findings). More specifically, they examine referring expressions (noun phrases and pronouns) across two spoken registers, conversation and public speeches (though we will not report the results of public speeches here) from the London-Lund corpus, and two written registers, news reportage and academic prose, from the LOB corpus. They found an uneven distribution of referring expressions. News reportage had the largest number (63 per 200 words), then conversation (61) and finally academic prose (51). To understand these differences better Biber et al. then looked at the distribution according to type of referring expression, retrieving frequencies across the registers for exophoric pronouns, anaphoric pronouns and anaphoric nouns. They discovered that exophoric referring expressions made up over half of the referring expressions in conversation, whereas they were almost non-existent in the written registers, news and academic prose. Those written registers were dominated by anaphoric nouns. In other words, people, not surprisingly, regularly refer to aspects of their immediate extralinguistic context in conversation, whereas in the written registers they refer to aspects of the (previous) text.

They also looked at the average distance between the referring expression and the antecedent in the various registers (the distance was defined as the number of intervening noun phrases). Some large differences emerged. The averages are: conversation (4.5), academic prose (9.0) and news reportage (11.0). That referring expressions occur much closer to their antecedents in conversation can be partly explained by the fact that conversation is conducted online with all the mental processing pressures that implies – referring expressions with short distances to their antecedents are easier to understand. But this finding is also a consequence of the referring expression type. Exophoric referring expressions do not have intervening textual material: they refer directly to their referents.

اخر الاخبار

اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

قسم الصناعات والحرف الفنية ينفذ أعمالًا تطويرية في جامعة الكفيل

قسم الشؤون الطبية يناقش تحضيراته لحفل التخرج المركزي لطالبات الجامعات العراقية العاشر

مركز الكفيل للإعلان والتسويق يباشر تنفيذ الأعمال الطباعية لحفل تخرج طالبات الجامعات العراقية العاشر

قسم رعاية الصحن يهيئ الأماكن المخصصة لفعاليات حفل تخرج طالبات الجامعات العراقية العاشر

المزيد

الآخبار الصحية

خصوصا مع تقدم السن.. 6 سلوكيات يومية قد تدمّر صحتك

فاكهة خضراء.. علاج طبيعي فعّال للإمساك واضطرابات الهضم

روسيا تبدأ أولى التجارب السريرية للقاح واعد ضد السرطان

كنز غذائي على طبقك.. ماذا تفعل السبانخ بجسمك؟

المزيد

الآخبار التكنلوجية

رصد نوع نادر من القطط في تايلاند للمرة الأولى منذ عقود

روسيا تخطط لإقامة محطة نووية في القمر خلال العقد المقبل

كيف قاد إيلون ماسك حملة "غروك" لاختراق عرش الذكاء الاصطناعي

ألتمان: الذكاء الاصطناعي سيتجاوز البشر في 2026 !

المزيد

مواضيع ذات صلة

Ambiguity

Speech acts

Maxim flouts

Flouting the maxims

Comedy pragmatics

Defeasible implicatures

The pragmatics of political interviews

Good cop, bad cop

The co-operative principle

Grice’s theory of implicature

Meaning in context

Pragmatics: saying what you mean