المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

الرياضيات
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 9761 موضوعاً
تاريخ الرياضيات
الرياضيات المتقطعة
الجبر
الهندسة
المعادلات التفاضلية و التكاملية
التحليل
علماء الرياضيات

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر
زكاة الفطرة
2024-11-05
زكاة الغنم
2024-11-05
زكاة الغلات
2024-11-05
تربية أنواع ماشية اللحم
2024-11-05
زكاة الذهب والفضة
2024-11-05
ماشية اللحم في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية
2024-11-05

دعوى الميراث
13-3-2019
hodiernal (adj.)
2023-09-19
مساعدوا الإنتاج- شؤون فنية
9-11-2021
LINEAR TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL-THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR LINEAR TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL
8-10-2016
speech community
2023-11-18
خلايا الوقود cells Fuel
17-7-2016

Johann Heinrich Lambert  
  
1156   10:12 صباحاً   date: 27-3-2016
Author : C J Scriba
Book or Source : Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography
Page and Part : ...


Read More
Date: 22-3-2016 754
Date: 30-6-2016 1612
Date: 27-3-2016 749

Born: 26 August 1728 in Mülhausen, Alsace (now Mulhouse, France)
Died: 25 September 1777 in Berlin, Prussia (now Germany)

 

Johann Heinrich Lambert's family were originally from Lorraine which was a French territory up to the Thirty Years' War. Three Christian denominations, Roman Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism, each tried to impose themselves and various countries joined in the conflicts which raged across Europe for many years. In 1635 the Lambert family, who were Calvinists, fled from Lorraine as religious refugees and settled in Mulhouse. At that time Mulhouse was a free imperial city which had formed defensive alliances with the Swiss.

Lambert's father, Lukas Lambert, was a tailor as his own father had been. Lukas married Elizabeth Schmerber in 1724 and Johann Heinrich Lambert was one of their five sons. It was a large family, with two girls in addition to the five boys, and Lukas Lambert did not have sufficient income to enable him to support and educate the family in comfort. Heinrich attended school in Mulhouse, receiving a reasonably good education up to the age of twelve, studying French and Latin in addition to elementary subjects. However, when he was twelve years old he had to leave school to help his father with tailoring. Most young boys would have ended their education at that point, but not young Heinrich who continued to study in his own spare time. Usually his day was fully occupied in helping his father but in the evenings he would study scientific subjects on his own.

This pattern of study became increasingly difficult when, at the age of fifteen, he had to work as a clerk to earn more money for the family. In fact it was a natural occupation for Heinrich since he had acquired great skill in calligraphy and he was given a job at the ironworks at Seppois, which was south of Mulhouse and almost due west of Basel. Soon his increasing skill in academic subjects helped him to gain work as a private tutor. When he was seventeen years old Lambert left his position at the ironworks to take up a post as secretary to Johann Rudolf Iselin who was the editor of the Basler Zeitung, a conservative daily paper. This position was ideal for Lambert who could now concentrate even more deeply on his own study of mathematics, astronomy, and philosophy. He wrote in a letter (see [1]):-

I bought some books in order to learn the first principles of philosophy. The first object of my endeavours was the means to become perfect and happy. I understood that the will could not be improved before the mind had been enlightened. I studied Christian Wolff "On the power of the human mind", Nicolas Malebranche "On the investigation of truth" and John Locke "Essay concerning human understanding". The mathematical sciences, in particular algebra and mechanics, provided me with clear and profound examples to confirm the rules I had learned. Thereby I was able to penetrate into other sciences more easily and more profoundly, and to explain them to others, too. It is true that I was aware of the lack of oral instruction, but I tried to replace this by even more assiduity ...

In 1748, when he was twenty years old, Lambert took up a new position, this time as a tutor in the home of Count Peter von Salis in Chur. This town was in Graubünden which at that time was part of the Swiss Confederation. He became tutor to the Count's grandson and his cousin, who were both eleven years old, and another family member who was seven. Lambert could now use the excellent library in the Count's home and was in an even stronger position to continue his studies of mathematics, astronomy, and philosophy. While in Chur, he made his own astronomical instruments and delved deeply into mathematical and physical topics.

It was in Chur that Lambert first came to be noticed by the scientific community. He was elected to the Literary Society of Chur and to the Swiss Scientific Society based in Basel. He undertook work for the Scientific Society such as making regular meteorological observations and he began to publish scientific articles, his first being on caloric heat which appeared in Acta Helvetica in 1755. This paper by Lambert on the theory of heat appeared in Volume 2 of the journal published by the Societas Helvetica which had been founded in 1751 (see [23] for details). In 1756 Lambert left Chur with the two older boys who he had tutored during the previous eight years; they were now 19 years old. He took the two young men on a "grand tour" of Europe, first visiting Göttingen. There Lambert met Kästner and Tobias Mayer, and was elected to the Learned Society of Göttingen.

Now 1756 was not the best time to begin a tour of Europe. In that year the French-Austrian alliance prepared to attack Prussia but the latter did not wait to be attacked and began hostilities by invading Saxony on 29 August. The French and Austrians began to get the upper hand in 1757 and occupied Göttingen while Lambert was studying there. He left with his two pupils and went to Utrecht which they used as a base for the next two years while they visited most of the main Dutch cities.

Lambert's first book, which was on the passage of light through various media, was published in The Hague in 1758. Before returning to Chur, Lambert took his pupils to Paris, where he met d'Alembert, and to Marseilles, Nice, Turin, and Milan. The thirty year old Lambert now decided that it was time to find a scientific position and left Peter von Salis's family soon after they had completed their "grand tour". However this did not prove to be an easy task and his first wish, namely to get a position in Göttingen, soon proved impossible to achieve. After a few months spent in Zurich making astronomical observations, he returned to his home in Mulhouse where he spent several further months. In 1759 he went to Augsburg where he found a publisher for two more of his books, Photometria and Cosmologische Briefe. Of Photometria, published in 1760, Scriba writes:-

Lambert carried out his experiments with few and primitive instruments, but his conclusions resulted in laws that bear his name. The exponential decrease of the light in a beam passing through an absorbing medium of uniform transparency is often called 'Lambert's law of absorption', although Bouguer discovered it earlier. 'Lambert's cosine law' states that the brightness of a diffusely radiating plane surface is proportional to the cosine of the angle formed by the line of sight and the normal to the surface.

In 1760 Euler recommended Lambert for the position of Professor of Astronomy at the St Petersburg Academy of Sciences to fill a vacancy which, due to a reorganization of the Academy and political changes, remained unfilled for several years. Lambert was asked to organise a Bavarian Academy of Sciences in Munich along the lines of the Berlin Academy, but he fell out with other members of the project and left the new Academy in 1762. By this time, however, his important work on cosmology Cosmologische Briefe (Cosmological letters on the arrangement of the world structure) (1761) had appeared. It is the first scientific presentation of the notion that the Universe is composed of galaxies of stars. Coffa, reviewing [22] writes:-

Lambert's finite Universe is composed of galaxies, supergalaxies and even higher systems of stars all of which rotate around their respective centres; each of these centres is occupied by a "regent", an immensely large, exceedingly dense and opaque body. The whole is dominated by the centralmost body or supreme regent, the body "which steers around itself the whole creation". Lambert's book is also remarkable for the modernity of its methodological stand: his systematic survey of the differences among facts, theories, predictions and possible verifications was not emulated in cosmological literature until the 20th century.

After returning from Munich, Lambert took part in a survey of the border between Milan and Chur, and also visited Leipzig where he was able to find a publisher for a work on philosophy Neues Organon (published in 1764).

He wanted to gain a position at the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin and so become a colleague of Euler and Lagrange. Lambert was therefore delighted to go to Berlin in 1764 at the invitation of Euler. However, although Lambert joined the Huguenot Church, of which Euler was a staunch member, differences between the two men soon arose, mainly concerning the income of the Academy, which depended on its privilege to sell calendars. It may well be that these differences contributed to Euler's decision to leave Berlin for St Petersburg in 1766. However these were not the only problems that Lambert faced after arriving in Berlin for at first Frederick II refused to appoint Lambert to the Academy on account of his unusual appearance, strange dress and eccentric behaviour. These were in part due to his humble background together with the fact that he deliberately chose not to conform to the conventions of the upper classes. Also it was in part due to his devout religious attitude. However, once Frederick II got to know Lambert, he discovered that he was a man of extraordinary insight. Scriba writes [1]:-

As a member of the physical class for twelve years, until his death at the age of forty-nine, Lambert produced more than 150 works for publication. He was the only member of the Academy to exercise regularly the right to read papers not only in his own class, but in any other class as well.

In 1766 Lambert wrote Theorie der Parallellinien which was a study of the parallel postulate. By assuming that the parallel postulate was false, he managed to deduce a large number of non-euclidean results. He noticed that in this new geometry the sum of the angles of a triangle increases as its area decreases.

Of his work on geometry, Folta writes in [14]:-

Lambert tried to build up geometry from two new principles: measurement and extent, which occurred in his version as definite building blocks of a more general metatheory. Above all, Lambert carefully considered the logical consequences of these axiomatically secure principles. His axioms concerning number can hardly be compared with Euclid's arithmetical axioms; in geometry he goes beyond the previously assumed concept of space, by establishing the properties of incidence. Lambert's physical erudition indicates yet another clear way in which it would be possible to eliminate the traditional myth of three-dimensional geometry through the parallels with the physical dependence of functions. A number of questions that were formulated by Lambert in his metatheory in the second half of the 18th century have not ceased to remain of interest today.

Lambert is best known, however, for his work on π. Euler had already established in 1737 that e and e2 are both irrational. However Lambert was the first to give a rigorous proof that π is irrational. In a paper presented to the Berlin Academy in 1768 Lambert showed that, if x is a nonzero rational number, then neither ex nor tan x can be rational. Since tan (π/4) = 1 then π/4 must be irrational. In [34] there is discussion of the claim that Lambert's proof is incomplete and requires a result by Legendre to complete it. Wallisser shows that Lambert's proof is not only complete but is an outstanding mathematical achievement for its time. In fact it was Pringsheim in 1898 who first noted that Lambert's proof was absolutely correct and exceptional for its time, since the expansion of the tangent function was not only written down formally, but also proved to be a convergent continued fraction. Also, remarkably, Lambert conjectured in this paper that e and π are transcendental. This was not proved for another century when Hermite proved that e is transcendental and Lindemann proved that π is transcendental.

Lambert also made the first systematic development of hyperbolic functions. A few years earlier they had been studied by Vincenzo Riccati. Lambert is also important for his study of the trigonometry of triangles on surfaces, his work on perspective and cartography, as well as his contributions to the theory of probability. In this latter topic, he gave a mathematical formulation of the law of mortality in 1772. His contributions to probability are evaluated by Garibaldi and Penco in [15]. They write:-

The lines drawn by Jacob Bernoulli in the "Ars conjectandi" were taken up and developed in a decisive way by Lambert, whose fundamental contributions to the theory of errors in measurement have been re-evaluated in recent years. Lambert's vast, multifaceted activity covered optics, cosmology and geodesy and put him in contact with the major scientists and philosophers of his day (Kant). In his own fundamental philosophical opus, the "Neues Organon", Lambert developed a noteworthy theory of logical probability that, to our knowledge, has thus far escaped the attention of eminent scholars in the field such as Keynes. Logical probability is a 'third general type of probability' that follows in order of exposition the 'a priori probability' typical of games of change and the 'a posteriori probability' of statistics.

He also made a major contribution to philosophy and in Anlage zur Architectonic (1771) he attempted to transform philosophy into a deductive science, modelled on Euclid's approach to geometry. In [3] Basso highlights Lambert's understanding of the main concepts of the deductive-geometric methodology, namely axioms, postulates, theorems, problems, constructions, and logic.


 

  1. C J Scriba, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990). 
    http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-2830902435.html
  2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica. 
    http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9046942/Johann-Heinrich-Lambert

Books:

  1. P Basso, Filosofia e geometria : Lambert interprete di Euclide, Il Filarete : Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell'Università degli Studi di Milano 183 (Florence, 1999).
  2. N Bokhove, Johann H. Lambert: 'Phänomenologie des Scheins', in Phänomenologie. Ursprung und Entwicklung des Terminus im 18. Jahrhundert (Utrecht, 1991)
  3. M E Eisenring, Johann Heinrich Lambert und die wissenschaftliche Philosophie der Gegenwart (Zürich, 1941).
  4. R Jaquel, Le savant et philosophe mulhousien Jean-Henri Lambert (1728-1777) : études critiques et documentaires (Paris, 1977).
  5. R Laurent, La place de J-H Lambert (1728-1777) dans l'histoire de la perspective (Paris, 1987).
  6. M Steck, Bibliographia Lambertiana (Hildesheim, 1970).

Articles:

  1. K-R Biermann, Wurde Leonhard Euler durch J H Lambert aus Berlin vertrieben?, in Ceremony and scientific conference on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the death of Leonhard Euler (Berlin, 1985), 91-99.
  2. K-R Biermann, Did J. H. Lambert drive Leonhard Euler out of Berlin? (Russian), in Development of the ideas of Leonhard Euler and modern science, 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1988), 93-101.
  3. A Dou, Origins of non-Euclidean geometry: Saccheri , Lambert and Taurinus (Spanish), in History of mathematics in the XIXth century, Part 1, Madrid, 1991 (Madrid, 1992), 43-63.
  4. K Dürr, Die Logistik Johann Heinrich Lamberts, in Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr. Andreas Speiser (Zürich, 1945), 47-65.
  5. J Folta, Lambert's 'Architectonics' and the foundations of geometry, Acta Historiae Rerum Naturalium necnon Technicarum, 1973 (Prague, 1974), 145-163.
  6. J Folta, Remarks on the axiomatic development of mathematics in the second half of the eighteenth century (A G Kästner, J H Lambert) (Czech), DVT-Dejiny Ved a Techniky 6 (1973), 189-205.
  7. U Garibaldi and M A Penco, Probability theory and physics between Bernoulli and Laplace : the contribution of J H Lambert (1728-1777) (Italian), in Proceedings of the fifth national congress on the history of physics, Rome, 1984, Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Sci. Fis. Natur. (5) 9 (1985), 341-346.
  8. L Giacardi, On the approximate calculation of the length of the circumference in Huygens and in Lambert : Conclusion of the Archimedean procedures and introduction of infinity (Italian), Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 37 (3) (1979), 43-58
  9. J J Gray and L Tilling, Johann Heinrich Lambert, mathematician and scientist 1728-1777, Historia Math. 5 (1) (1978), 13-41.
  10. A T Grigor'yan and N I Nevskaya, J H Lambert and the Petersburg Academy of Sciences (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. 25 (1980), 218-224, 379.
  11. G B Halsted, Biography. John Heny Lambert, Amer. Math. Monthly 2 (1895), 209-211.
  12. M A Hoskin, Newton and Lambert, Vistas Astronom. 22 (4) (1978), 483-484.
  13. S L Jaki, Sur l'édition et la réédition de la traduction française des 'Cosmologische Briefe' de Lambert, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl. 32 (4) (1979), 305-314.
  14. S L Jaki, Lambert and the watershed of cosmology, Scientia (Milano) 113 (1-4) (1978), 75-95.
  15. R Jaquel, Introduction à l'étude des débuts scientifiques (1752-1755) du savant universel Jean-Henri Lambert (1728-1777) : le rôle de Daniel Bernoulli, in Proceedings of the 104th National Congress of Learned Societies (Paris, 1979), 27-38.
  16. Z A Kuziceva, Symbolic logic in the writings of J H Lambert (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. 25 (1980), 225-247, 379.
  17. B L Laptev, Lambert, the geometer (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. 25 (1980), 248-260; 379.
  18. B L Laptev and A P Juskevic, J H Lambert (on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of his birth) (Russian), Mat. v Shkole (5) (1979), 69-72.
  19. R Laurent, Les problèmes de géométrie de la règle comme contribution au développement de la géométrie projective dans l'oeuvre de Jean-Henri Lambert (1728--1777), in Faire de l'histoire des mathématiques : documents de travail, Marseille, 1983 (Paris, 1987), 271-291.
  20. J-P Lubet, De Lambert à Cauchy : la résolution des équations littérales par le moyen des séries, Rev. Histoire Math. 4 (1) (1998), 73-129.
  21. P Schreiber, Johann Heinrich Lambert zum Gedenken, NTM Schr. Geschichte Natur. Tech. Medizin 15 (1) (1978), 1-7.
  22. G Shafer, Nonadditive probabilities in the work of Bernoulli and Lambert, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 19 (4) (1978/79), 309-370.
  23. O B Sheynim, J H Lambert's Work on Probability, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 7 (1971), 244-256.
  24. J Véron, Les mathématiques de la population, de Lambert à Lotka, Math. Sci. Hum. No. 159 (2002), 43-56.
  25. O Volk, Johann Heinrich Lambert and the determination of orbits for planets and comets, Celestial Mech. 21 (2) (1980), 237-250.
  26. R Wallisser, On Lambert's proof of the irrationality of π, in Algebraic number theory and Diophantine analysis, Graz, 1998 (Berlin, 2000), 521-530.
  27. G Wolters, 'Theorie' und 'Ausübung' in der Methodologie von Johann Heinrich Lambert, in Theoria cum praxi : on the relationship of theory and practice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, Vol. I, Hannover, 1977 (Wiesbaden, 1980), 109-114.
  28. A P Yushkevich, J H Lambert and L Euler (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. 25 (1980), 189-217; 379.
  29. A P Yushkevich, Lambert et Leonhard Euler, in Colloque International et Interdisciplinaire Jean-Henri Lambert, Mulhouse, 1977 (Paris, 1979), 211-223.
  30. J Zackova, The problem of squaring the circle and Lambert's proof of the irrationality of the number π (Czech), Pokroky Mat. Fyz. Astronom. 11 (1966), 240-250.

 




الجبر أحد الفروع الرئيسية في الرياضيات، حيث إن التمكن من الرياضيات يعتمد على الفهم السليم للجبر. ويستخدم المهندسون والعلماء الجبر يومياً، وتعول المشاريع التجارية والصناعية على الجبر لحل الكثير من المعضلات التي تتعرض لها. ونظراً لأهمية الجبر في الحياة العصرية فإنه يدرّس في المدارس والجامعات في جميع أنحاء العالم. ويُعجب الكثير من الدارسين للجبر بقدرته وفائدته الكبيرتين، إذ باستخدام الجبر يمكن للمرء أن يحل كثيرًا من المسائل التي يتعذر حلها باستخدام الحساب فقط.وجاء اسمه من كتاب عالم الرياضيات والفلك والرحالة محمد بن موسى الخورازمي.


يعتبر علم المثلثات Trigonometry علماً عربياً ، فرياضيو العرب فضلوا علم المثلثات عن علم الفلك كأنهما علمين متداخلين ، ونظموه تنظيماً فيه لكثير من الدقة ، وقد كان اليونان يستعملون وتر CORDE ضعف القوسي قياس الزوايا ، فاستعاض رياضيو العرب عن الوتر بالجيب SINUS فأنت هذه الاستعاضة إلى تسهيل كثير من الاعمال الرياضية.

تعتبر المعادلات التفاضلية خير وسيلة لوصف معظم المـسائل الهندسـية والرياضـية والعلمية على حد سواء، إذ يتضح ذلك جليا في وصف عمليات انتقال الحرارة، جريان الموائـع، الحركة الموجية، الدوائر الإلكترونية فضلاً عن استخدامها في مسائل الهياكل الإنشائية والوصف الرياضي للتفاعلات الكيميائية.
ففي في الرياضيات, يطلق اسم المعادلات التفاضلية على المعادلات التي تحوي مشتقات و تفاضلات لبعض الدوال الرياضية و تظهر فيها بشكل متغيرات المعادلة . و يكون الهدف من حل هذه المعادلات هو إيجاد هذه الدوال الرياضية التي تحقق مشتقات هذه المعادلات.