

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Underlying representations
المؤلف:
David Hornsby
المصدر:
Linguistics A complete introduction
الجزء والصفحة:
95-5
2023-12-16
1407
Underlying representations
We have seen how the final [t] sounds of Rad and Rat in German can be understood as underlyingly ‘different’ although pronounced identically. In many other cases too, we can only account for the facts of what a native speaker ‘knows’ about his/her language by appealing to an underlying representation of the words he/she utters. While phonologists (and linguists generally) are sometimes accused of over-abstraction and/or abstruse terminology, there are occasions where explanation at an abstract level can yield valuable insights, as the following two examples will demonstrate.
Most varieties of British and southern hemisphere English are non-rhotic, i.e. they only have /r/ before vowels. Rhotic areas like North America, or the west of England, by contrast, do allow /r/ in other positions. The normal pronunciation of the following words in non-rhotic Essex, therefore, differs from that of rhotic Somerset (note that West Country accents use the retroflex /r/ variant
):

In spite of the fact that Essex speakers do not pronounce the /r/ in these words, many phonologists would argue that their underlying representations of each of these words is the same as that of their Somerset counterparts, i.e. that even for an Essex speaker car is underlyingly
, but Essex speakers have an /r/ deletion rule which Somerset speakers do not. But does this not simply defy common sense? How can it be helpful to posit an underlying /r/ which simply isn’t there?
A phonologist might respond that, even for non-rhotic speakers, the /r/ actually is there, in some circumstances: even for non-rhotic speakers, it reappears before a vowel:
car /r/ of the year
Arthur /r/ and Jim
beer /r/ and sandwiches
Non-rhotic Essex speakers may not use the /r/ when these words are pronounced in isolation but they ‘know’ which words have an underlying /r/ which appears intervocalically, and which do not: no one would say tree */r/ on the hill for example. Not only does the abstract representation and /r/-deletion rule analysis account for a fact about the speaker’s knowledge of his/her language, it also captures a diachronic fact about English: non-prevocalic /r/ used to be pronounced in all varieties, but a change occurred in some, but not others, which led to its deletion. To account for these data otherwise would require specification of a complex /r/ rule for non-rhotic speakers setting out in detail the environments in which it can and cannot occur: positing an underlying /r/ in the representation looks altogether neater and more elegant. Some phonologists, it should be pointed out, would reject the underlying /r/ analysis in favor of an insertion rule on the grounds that many speakers insert the consonant even where it is etymologically unjustified, a phenomenon known as ‘intrusive r’:
law /r/ and order
India /r/ and Pakistan
Disputes between linguists are more likely to be over the most elegant account of the data available than about the data themselves!
الاكثر قراءة في Phonetics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)