

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Free and not-so-free variation
المؤلف:
David Hornsby
المصدر:
Linguistics A complete introduction
الجزء والصفحة:
88-5
2023-12-14
1142
Free and not-so-free variation
As we saw, [t], [th] and [?] are all allophones of /t/. There is, however, an important difference here between the distribution of [t] and [th] on the one hand, which are in complementary distribution and cannot occur in the same environments, and [?] on the other, which appears (at least in some environments) to substitute freely for [t], as in the water example above: many speakers in fact switch between the two. Similarly, in Spanish, which does not have a phonemic opposition between /b/ and /v/, the word Vale! (‘Ok!’) can be pronounced [bale], [vale] or
is the IPA symbol for a voiced bilabial fricative), and be understood in the same way in each case. Alternation of this kind, which is unconstrained by phonetic environment, is known as free variation and was long dismissed by linguists as being of little theoretical interest – a case of ‘You say tomayto, and I say tomahto’, if you like – and scarcely worthy of comment (‘…so let’s call the whole thing off’). There is, however, a very important difference between water as
and as
, namely that the latter pronunciation, in British English at least, is of considerably lower status than the former, something of which most speakers are acutely aware. The variation, then, is socially rather than phonetically conditioned.
Linguists long chose to ignore this obvious fact on the grounds that social data should not be allowed to intrude upon linguistics if it were to establish itself as an autonomous discipline and be taken seriously as a science. This consensus was challenged in the 1960s by sociolinguists who argued that no satisfactory explanation of language change could be provided without taking account of social factors. As we shall see, their findings have forced us to revise our view of how ‘free’ so-called free variation actually is.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonetics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)