1

المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية

Grammar

Tenses

Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous

Past

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous

Past Simple

Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous

Passive and Active

Parts Of Speech

Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective

Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pre Position

Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition

Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

Interjections

Express calling interjection

Grammar Rules

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Semantics

Pragmatics

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced

Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

English Language : Linguistics : Phonology :

Differential Treatment of Mismatches

المؤلف:  Mehmet Yavas̡

المصدر:  Applied English Phonology

الجزء والصفحة:  P204-C8

2025-03-19

234

Differential Treatment of Mismatches

We observed, besides many phonetic mismatches, several examples of phonemic mismatches between a learner’s L1 and L2. Although the difficulties resulting from these mismatches are real, there seem to be differences in quality among them, and consequently, degrees of difficulty created by different types of mismatches.

 

One type of phonemic mismatch between two systems was a result of a situation in which the two sounds that were in contrast in L2 were non-existent in L1. This was exemplified by the /θ/ – /ð/ contrast of English (e.g. ether [iθɚ] vs. either [iðɚ]). As we saw above, many languages, including Arabic, French, German, Korean, Turkish, Persian, Portuguese, and Russian, lack these completely, and the likely substitutions created violations of target contrasts.

 

The second mismatch that resulted in phonemic violations occurred when two sounds that were in contrast in L2 were present as the allophones of a single phoneme in L1.

 

As mentioned earlier, the English contrast between /t/ and /tʃ/ (e.g. tip [tɪp] vs. chip [tʃɪp]) is under-differentiated by learners whose L1 is Portuguese, because the two sounds are allophones of the same phoneme in their L1, as shown in the following:

 

The first situation involves acquiring new phoneme(s), and the second type is a creation of a phonemic split from an existing allophonic variation in the native language. While one may be inclined to think that acquiring new phoneme(s) will be more difficult than rearranging the two existing sounds from allophones of the same phoneme to separate phonemes, research has proven otherwise. It has been shown that learning becomes more difficult when the structures or sounds are similar in L1 and L2 than when they are dissimilar (Oller and Ziahosseyni 1970; Flege 1987, 1990; Major and Kim 1999).

EN

تصفح الموقع بالشكل العمودي