Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Differential Treatment of Mismatches
المؤلف:
Mehmet Yavas̡
المصدر:
Applied English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
P204-C8
2025-03-19
234
Differential Treatment of Mismatches
We observed, besides many phonetic mismatches, several examples of phonemic mismatches between a learner’s L1 and L2. Although the difficulties resulting from these mismatches are real, there seem to be differences in quality among them, and consequently, degrees of difficulty created by different types of mismatches.
One type of phonemic mismatch between two systems was a result of a situation in which the two sounds that were in contrast in L2 were non-existent in L1. This was exemplified by the /θ/ – /ð/ contrast of English (e.g. ether [iθɚ] vs. either [iðɚ]). As we saw above, many languages, including Arabic, French, German, Korean, Turkish, Persian, Portuguese, and Russian, lack these completely, and the likely substitutions created violations of target contrasts.
The second mismatch that resulted in phonemic violations occurred when two sounds that were in contrast in L2 were present as the allophones of a single phoneme in L1.
As mentioned earlier, the English contrast between /t/ and /tʃ/ (e.g. tip [tɪp] vs. chip [tʃɪp]) is under-differentiated by learners whose L1 is Portuguese, because the two sounds are allophones of the same phoneme in their L1, as shown in the following:
The first situation involves acquiring new phoneme(s), and the second type is a creation of a phonemic split from an existing allophonic variation in the native language. While one may be inclined to think that acquiring new phoneme(s) will be more difficult than rearranging the two existing sounds from allophones of the same phoneme to separate phonemes, research has proven otherwise. It has been shown that learning becomes more difficult when the structures or sounds are similar in L1 and L2 than when they are dissimilar (Oller and Ziahosseyni 1970; Flege 1987, 1990; Major and Kim 1999).