

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Theoretical implications: Against the separation of form and meaning in morphology
المؤلف:
Ingo Plag
المصدر:
Morphological Productivity
الجزء والصفحة:
P234-C8
2025-02-14
1325
Theoretical implications: Against the separation of form and meaning in morphology
The findings presented have important implications for a central issue in morphological theory, the relation of form and meaning in complex words. I will argue that the properties of verb-deriving processes provide strong arguments for a sign-based model of morphology, and against theories that try to separate form and meaning in morphology (e.g. Beard 1995, Don 1993, Gussmann 1987, Szymanek 1985). It is important to note that the label 'sign-based' should not be confused with 'morpheme-based'.7 My use of the former term refers to the output-oriented nature of morphological processes which I have frequently pointed out, and which has recently been argued for in detail by Orgun (1996).
My central arguments against separation as they emerge from the foregoing investigation concern two points, the polysemy of individual processes and the putative synonymy of competing processes. A similar approach is taken in Booij (1986). His objections against separationism are, however, almost exclusively based on the analysis of polysemy. The implications of rival processes are only very briefly discussed in that article and summarized in the final remark that "we should ... develop a more sophisticated theory of how word-formation rules with competing affixes interact" (1986:505).
Before discussing these points in detail, I will briefly summarize the key ideas of separationist theories, referring mainly to the work of Robert Beard (e.g. 1981, 1987a, 1987b, 1988, 1990a, 1990b, 1995), who has developed the most sophisticated of these theories, so-called Lexeme-Morpheme-Base Morphology (LMBM).
1 It may not have escaped the reader's attention that I have avoided the use of the term 'morpheme' as far as possible. The theoretical problems involved with this term are notorious and need not be repeated here.
الاكثر قراءة في Morphology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)