

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
LOGIC IN WRITING, THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING; LOGIC IN WRITING
المؤلف:
BARBARA MINTO
المصدر:
THE MINTO PYRAMID PRINCIPLE
الجزء والصفحة:
1-1
2024-09-03
1061
LOGIC IN WRITING, THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING LOGIC IN WRITING
One of the least pleasant aspects of a professional person's job is the need to put things in writing. Almost everyone finds it a chore and wishes he were better at it. And many people are told specifically that they need to hone this skill if they want to progress.
The reason most people fail to show much improvement is that they assume that writing more clearly means writing simpler, more direct sentences. And it is often true that the sentences in their documents are overlong and unwieldy. Moreover, their language is frequently too technical or too abstract, and their paragraphs on occasion are awkwardly developed.
But these are weaknesses of style, and it is notoriously difficult for a person who has completed the formal part of his education to change his writing style. Not that it cannot be done; rather it's like learning to type. It requires a good many repetitive exercises, for which most on-the-job writers in industry and government simply cannot find the time. As a result, they continue to be told they need to write "more clearly."
However, there is a second cause of unclear writing, far more pervasive than the first and much easier to correct. This relates to the structure of the document-the order in which the sentences appear regardless of whether they are well or poorly written. If a person's writing is unclear, it is most likely because the ordering of the ideas conflicts with the capability of a reader's mind to process them.
The easiest order for a reader is to receive the major, more abstract ideas before he is required to take in the minor, supporting ones. And since the major ideas are always derived from the minor ones, the ideal structure of the ideas will always be a pyramid of groups of ideas tied together by a single overall thought. Within that pyramidal structure, the ideas will relate vertically-in that a point at any level will always be a summary of the ideas grouped below; and horizontally-in that the ideas will have been grouped together because together they present a logical argument.
You can very easily communicate to a reader the ideas arranged in a pyramidal £orm by simply starting at the top and moving down each leg of the pyramid. The statement of the major ideas causes the reader to question the writer's basis for making the point, and the next level down in the pyramid answers that question. You then continue the question/answer dialogue until you have communicated all the ideas to the reader.
This question/answer response to stated ideas appears to be automatic in everyone, regardless of nationality. Also true of each of us is the fact that we cannot know what we think precisely until we have symbolized it in some way, either by saying it out loud or writing it down. Fortunately, it turns out that the structure required to clarify a person's thinking to himself is also a pyramid. Thus, the writer who forces himself to structure his thinking into a pyramid also finds that he has so clarified the thinking that he can easily write clear; direct sentences.
This first section explains why a reader responds best to a pyramid structure, and how the logical substructures that make up that pyramid interact. It tells you how to use this knowledge to identify the ideas you need to include in a particular document, and to work out a clear relationship between them. It also gives a detailed analysis of the logic of introductions, and dispels the confusion that may surround your understanding of deductive and inductive argument.
At the end, you will understand the basics of how to form your thinking into a simple pyramid structure. Subsequent sections will explain the subtleties of using the pyramid rules to check that the points you include in the pyramid are indeed valid, coherent, and complete, and to help you discover your unarticulated ideas, which can lead to moving your thinking forward creatively.
الاكثر قراءة في Writing
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)