Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Sequential actions vs. simultaneous states.
المؤلف:
CHARLES E. OSGOOD
المصدر:
Semantics AN INTERDISCIPLINARY READER IN PHILOSOPHY, LINGUISTICS AND PSYCHOLOGY
الجزء والصفحة:
517-28
2024-08-23
699
Sequential actions vs. simultaneous states.
The two thrice-repeated demonstrations, #12-14 where BLACK, BLUE and ORANGE BALLS successively collide and #18-20 where BALL IS ON TUBE AND TUBE IS ON PLATE, have similar event structures, in that there are three entities involved, the ‘middle’ one participating in two events. But the former involves sequential actions in time and the latter a simultaneous set of stative relations. It was predicted that sequential actions would lead to a corresponding ordering of NPs representing the entities involved to a greater extent than for the entities in simultaneous stative relationships; furthermore, this ordering should be more stable over repeated sentences describing the action situation than over sentences describing the stative situations. Table n gives the percentage of sentences in which the entities appear in first, second and third NPs as functions of both the perceptual ordering of the entities (in time for BLACK, BLUE and ORANGE BALLS and in space, from top to bottom, for BALL, TUBE and PLATE) and the ordering of successive sentences describing the same situations.
The predicted difference in strength of ordering of NPs does not hold for the first presentations of each type of situation; BLACK (57% 1st NP), BLUE (68% 2nd NP) and ORANGE (61 % 3rd NP) is matched by BALL (57% 1st NP), TUBE (64% 2nd NP) and PLATE (72% 3rd NP). Apparently there is a strong tendency to describe stative vertical relations from top to bottom. However, the ordering of NPs is much more stable across repeated descriptions of the same situation for sequential as compared with simultaneous relations; on the third presentation, we find BLACK (46 % 1st NP), BLUE (61% 2nd NP) and ORANGE (50% 3rd NP), despite instructions to generate different sentences, whereas we find BALL (23% 1st NP), TUBE (57% 2nd NP) and PLATE (34% 3rd NP) by the third presentation for the simultaneous display. It is noteworthy that the ‘ middle5 entity (participating in both events) is the most stable as the second NP in both sequential and simultaneous situations and that the perceptually polar entities rarely appear as the second NPs - as if the most available transformation involved a simple shift in polarity, from first to last and from top to bottom as initially encoded entities. There is also a marked difference between temporal and spatial patterns in terms of how entity relations are expressed, with relative clauses or with prepositional phrases: simultaneous stative relations (#18-20) produced an average of 95 % sentences with prepositional phrases (. . .on the plate) but only 28 % sentences with relative clauses, and most of these included prepositional phrases (. . . which is on the plate); sequential action relations (# 12-14), on the other hand, produced only 22 % sentences with prepositional phrases (. . . into the orange ball) as compared with 36 % sentences with relative clauses (. . . which hits the orange ball).
الاكثر قراءة في Semantics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية
الاكثر قراءة في Semantics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
