

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Aspect
المؤلف:
Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman
المصدر:
What is Morphology
الجزء والصفحة:
P214-C7
2026-04-21
24
Aspect
Kujamaat Jóola does not have a tense system that expresses time-related notions like ‘past’ and ‘present’ directly.1 Instead, it has an aspectual system. This means that it expresses notions such as duration, completeness, and doubt, which have more to do with the nature of the action of the verb or with the speaker’s attitude than with time. The unmarked form of the verb can be interpreted as either present or past, as seen in (5):

The suffix -ε:n, the so-called dubitive-incompletive, is used to indicate that an action has not been completed (much like the imperfect aspect familiar from English or the Romance languages) or that it is in doubt.2 In (6), the final /n/ of the past absolute suffix assimilates in place with the following labial stop, surfacing as [m]:

In (6), it is understood that the subject no longer has money. Thomas and Sapir (1967) present another example: Fuken nij••njaw kabaak, εmitey dεs ɔfɔm məniləñu ‘Yesterday I was going to Kabâk, but the rain overtook me (en route) and I returned (without getting there).’ Here the verb nijεεn jaw (jεεn < -jaw-ε:n ‘go’ + INC) ‘was going’ indicates that the action of going was not completed. Without the dubitive-incompletive marker, this sentence would mean instead that the subject went to Kabâk despite the rain.
The dubitive-incompletive marker -ε:n may co-occur with other position-1 suffixes. It may precede or follow -εrit (habitual negative), -ut (negative), ɔrut ‘not yet’, ɔrulɔ:t ‘toward speaker’ (negative), and -ulɔ ‘toward speaker’. This fact suggests that they are in the same position. However, it always precedes the other variants of -ulɔ, -u, and -ul, as well as the habitual marker -ε and the second portion of the first person plural inclusive subject circumfix -a ̴-al.
Doubling the dubitive-incompletive marker emphasizes it. Such doubling occurs only in contrastive constructions. This is a good illustration of compositional semantics: it is as though each suffix contributes a degree of meaning:

We learned immediately above that there is some flexibility regarding the placement of the dubitive-incompletive suffix -ε:n with respect to other first-position suffixes. The second member of the emphatic construction -ε:n … -ε:n is even more flexible: it may be placed anywhere with respect to the first-position suffixes except directly after the habitual -ε.3 It can even follow an object pronoun.
Future in Kujamaat Jóola is expressed by using the resultative and resultative negative markers pan- and lε-∼lεt-, which appear outside of inflectional morphology for subject, as we see in the following examples (the /-n/ of pan- is dropped before nasals):

In relative clauses, the future is expressed by a resultative clitic pi that combines with the marker agreeing with the relativized subject or object (Sapir 1965: 92). We see this in (9):

Lastly, combining the dubitive-incompletive suffix with the resultative prefix lεt-, a negative marker, results in a construction that indicates an action that missed taking place or that will not be accomplished. We might translate it as ‘might have’ or ‘might not have’.

The Kujamaat habitual marker is seen in (11). Gero and Levinsohn (1993) point out that it has a progressive use as well, in which case it occurs with the verb ‘be’ (12) (example from Gero and Levinsohn 1993: 82):

1 Neither does English, in fact.
2 In Sapir (1965), the suffix -ε:n is considered a past marker, and its reduplicated form, which we learn below is emphatic dubitive-incompletive, is considered an indicator of remote past. He revises this analysis in his 1967 paper.
3 This is probably due to a phonological constraint against superlong vowels, which we would have if the habitual e were to merge with ε:n. Furthermore, if the illicit sequence */ε+ε:n/ were to be reduced to /ε:n/, the habitual meaning would be unrecoverable.
الاكثر قراءة في Morphology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)