Radical Experimental Plane With No Moving Parts Wows Scientists
9:43:22 2018-11-22 849

Some 115 years after the first powered flight, scientists have developed a radical new approach towards flying in the form of a small, lightweight and virtually noiseless airplane that gets airborne with no moving parts like propellers or turbine blades.

 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineers on Wednesday described successful flight tests at an indoor campus gymnasium of the unmanned airplane powered not by engines that burn fossils fuels but by ion wind propulsion, also called electro-aerodynamic thrust.

 

The aircraft, called Version 2 EAD Airframe, or V2, weighs only 5.4 pounds (2.45 kg) with a wingspan of 16-1/2 feet (5 meters).

 

"This is the first time that an airplane without moving parts has flown," said MIT aerospace engineer Steven Barrett, who drew inspiration from fictional shuttlecraft from Star Trek.

 

Electrical field strength near an array of thin filaments called emitters at the front of the wing ionizes air, meaning electrons are removed and charged molecules called ions are created. These positively charged ions are attracted to negatively charged structures on the plane called collectors. As they move towards the collectors, the ions collide with air molecules, transferring energy to them. This creates a flow of air that gives the plane its thrust.

Only time will tell whether the test flights at the duPont Athletic Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, will become historic like the 1903 test flights of the first airplane by Wilbur and Orville Wright at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. And the engineers readily acknowledge their V2 prototype is inefficient and limited.

 

But it could lead to big things.

 

"I'm trying not to over-sell it, but there are some really exciting possibilities here," said Barrett, who pointed to near-silent drones as a possibility within several years.

 

"In the long term, I'm hoping for ultra-efficient and nearly silent airplanes that have no moving control surfaces like rudders or elevators, no moving propulsion system like propellers or turbines, and no direct combustion emissions like you get with burning jet fuel," added Barrett, who led the research published in the journal Nature.

 

The researchers conducted 11 test flights in which V2 flew about 200 feet (60 meters), typically flying less than 6-1/2 feet (2 meters) off the ground.

 

The plane, defined as a solid-state machine because it has no moving parts, was built to be as light as possible using materials like carbon-fibre, balsa wood, a plastic called polystyrene, shrink-wrap plastic and Kevlar.

 

© Thomson Reuters 2018

Reality Of Islam

A Mathematical Approach to the Quran

10:52:33   2024-02-16  

mediation

2:36:46   2023-06-04  

what Allah hates the most

5:1:47   2023-06-01  

allahs fort

11:41:7   2023-05-30  

striving for success

2:35:47   2023-06-04  

Imam Ali Describes the Holy Quran

5:0:38   2023-06-01  

livelihood

11:40:13   2023-05-30  

silence about wisdom

3:36:19   2023-05-29  

MOST VIEWS

Importance of Media

9:3:43   2018-11-05

Illuminations

a wisdom

8:4:21   2022-01-08

use you time well

4:26:43   2022-02-21

belief cause cleanliness

10:47:11   2022-11-22

your thoughts

8:15:37   2023-02-16

your character

2:33:4   2023-02-15

different roles

9:42:16   2022-10-19

noah & his ark

7:59:14   2018-06-21



IMmORTAL Words
LATEST Eating 3 Servings of Berries a Day Could Boost Healthy Aging, Study Reveals Sodium Fuel Cell from MIT Powers Planes, Captures Carbon, and Outruns Batteries Astronauts Reveal the Shocking Beauty of Lightning from Space Be a Good Evaluator of Suggestions and Solutions Interpretation of Sura Hud - Verses 66-68 Karbala Revitalized the True Islamic Spirit This Type of Fiber Could Have Weight Loss Benefits Similar to Ozempic Trees May Be Able to Warn Us When a Volcano Is About to Erupt Scientists Developed a Kind of Living Concrete That Heals Its Own Cracks Safer Vapes Might Be Worse: Ultrasonic Devices Found Full of Toxic Metals Why ChatGPTs Essays Do Not Fool the Experts – Yet Why Glaciers Will Not Recover – Even If We Cool the Planet