المرجع الالكتروني للمعلوماتية
المرجع الألكتروني للمعلوماتية

English Language
عدد المواضيع في هذا القسم 5730 موضوعاً
Grammar
Linguistics
Reading Comprehension

Untitled Document
أبحث عن شيء أخر
{فازلهما الشيطان عنها فاخرجهما مما كانا فيه}
2024-07-06
آدم والنهي عن الشجرة
2024-07-06
سجود الملائكة واعراض ابليس
2024-07-06
من آداب عصر الغيبة: الاستغاثة به
2024-07-06
من آداب عصر الغيبة: التبرؤ من أعدائه
2024-07-06
من آداب عصر الغيبة: إحياء أمره بين الناس
2024-07-06

الأفعال التي تنصب مفعولين
23-12-2014
صيغ المبالغة
18-02-2015
الجملة الإنشائية وأقسامها
26-03-2015
اولاد الامام الحسين (عليه السلام)
3-04-2015
معاني صيغ الزيادة
17-02-2015
انواع التمور في العراق
27-5-2016

X-bar (adj./n.)  
  
352   11:28 صباحاً   date: 2023-12-07
Author : David Crystal
Book or Source : A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics
Page and Part : 525-24


Read More
Date: 2023-11-06 2150
Date: 2023-09-02 467
Date: 2023-10-17 508

X-bar (adj./n.) ( or X′)

A system of GRAMMATICAL analysis developed in GENERATIVE LINGUISTICS as an alternative to traditional accounts of PHRASE STRUCTURE and LEXICAL CATEGORIES. It is argued both that the rules of phrase-structure grammar need to be more constrained (see constraint), and that more phrasal CATEGORIES need to be recognized. In particular, within the NOUN PHRASE, the need is felt to recognize intermediate categories larger than the noun but smaller than the phrase, e.g. very fast or very fast car in the phrase the very fast car. These intermediate categories, which have no status in previous phrase-structure models, are formally recognized in X-bar SYNTAX by a system of X-bars, each of which identifies a level of phrasal EXPANSION. Given a lexical category, X, X0 = ‘X with no bars’ (i.e. ‘zero-bar’, the category itself);  = X1 = ‘X-bar’ = ‘X-single-bar’;  = X2 = ‘X-double-bar’;  = X3 = ‘X-treble-bar’; and so on. For example, the following TREE illustrates two levels of expansion for N (‘N-bar’ and ‘N-double-bar’):

 

Each of the bar categories corresponding to X is known as a bar-projection of X. The value of recognizing intermediate categories in this way is widely agreed, but discussion continues about the number of categories which need to be recognized, and how far it is possible to generalize rules of category formation throughout a grammar.