

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses

Part of Speech


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The rise of a relative clause construction
المؤلف:
Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva
المصدر:
The Genesis of Grammar
الجزء والصفحة:
P288-C6
2026-03-24
104
The rise of a relative clause construction
As we observed in “The demonstrative channel”, the most frequent development in the languages of the world is to create a new relative clause structure via the grammaticalization of demonstrative pronouns (not attributes), and creoles have also made use of this mechanism, as we will now demonstrate with an example from the English-based creole Sranan of Suriname.1 Sranan arose in the late seventeenth century on the plantations of Suriname, which was made a British Colony in 1651; in 1668, Dutch became the colonial language. As in pidgins and newly emerged creoles, there were essentially no formally marked relative clauses in early Sranan: The English relativizers were lost, and most of the text examples that were seemingly unmarked relative clauses might also receive alternative interpretations, and there is no evidence that there was a recursive structure of relativization. Zero marking of relative clauses continued throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
For most of the seventeenth century, the demonstrative disi ‘this’ (< English this) was functioning both as a nominal modifier and a pronoun (we will refer to this as stage 0). Probably around the end of the seventeenth century, disi developed from demonstrative to relativizer within the short period of half a century, thereby giving rise to an overtly recursive structure (stage 1). In the course of the eighteenth century, disi underwent extension as an explicit relativizer. However, while disi could be understood as a relative clause marker determining the preceding noun, an interpretation of disi as a demonstrative in an independent clause could not be ruled out in most cases. However, there are eighteenth century examples such as (16), where disi was already unambiguously a relativizer.

But disi underwent a further grammaticalization, namely one from relative marker to adverbial clause subordinator (CONJ): In the second half of the eighteenth century, if not earlier, its use was extended to introduce temporal, causal, and concessive clauses; cf. (17a), which illustrates its temporal, and (17b) its causal uses.


In eighteenth-century sources, the relativizer had the form disi; in the course of the nineteenth century, the new relativizer disi underwent erosion, that is, it was shortened to di, leading to the separation of demonstrative and relative marker. As example (17b) shows however, instances of erosion of disi can be found much earlier.
The whole process of the rise and development of new forms of clause subordination, however, did not mean that the original zero-marked structure was abandoned; rather, the latter survived to some extent and is still accessible today. The major stages in the development of Sranan disi are summarized in Table 6.3.
To conclude, Sranan speakers appear to have created subordinate clause structures in accordance with universal parameters of grammaticalization. A strikingly similar example was presented in “The rise of new functional categories”, involving the development of the Kenya Pidgin Swahili demonstrative ile ‘that’. As grammaticalization theory would predict, in both cases there was a sequence of stages as sketched in Table 6.4.
Accordingly, in both cases there was a demonstrative pronoun used non-recursively that was grammaticalized to a new syntactic structure, thereby giving rise to a recursive structure of clause subordination.

1 For the data on this process, see Bruyn (1995a, 1995b, 1998).
الاكثر قراءة في Clauses
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)