Explaining "How to"

Frequently, particularly in consulting, you write because someone has a problem and you are telling him how to solve it. The Key Line structure of any "how to" Steps," as shown below:

 

However, the introductory structure varies slightly depending on whether you are telling the reader how to do something he has not done before or whether you are telling him how to do properly what he is already doing. The memorandum on The Role of the Board is an example of the first type:

S =  Must do X activity

C =  Not set up to do so

Q =  How do we get set up?

 

By contrast, suppose you have a company whose market forecasting system gives inaccurate forecasts, and they want you to tell them how to make it give accurate ones. The structure is always:

S = Your present system is X

C =  It doesn't work properly

Q =  How change to make it work properly?

 

The trick here is to begin your thinking by literally laying out the present process as they do it now. Then lay out the process as you think it should be done. The differences between the first structure and the second tell you what the steps on your Key Line must be.

 

Let me emphasize the importance of making the two processes visible to yourself before you begin to write. You may assume that you know precisely what they are, having been working on them for so long. But unless you lay them out and compare them, the chances of leaving something important out are very great.

 

I have seen so many examples of incomplete thinking in this area that I make a special point of mentioning it here, and explaining it in more detail in Appendix B, Examples of Introductory Structures. Indeed, we had an example in the Big Chief memo.

مواضيع ذات صلة

The Reader Knows Little or Nothing

The Reader Knows the Old and the New

DESCRIBING CHANGES TO PROCESSES

Dealing with Alternative Solutions

Proposing Steps to Solve Problems

DIFFICULT INTRODUCTORY FORMS

Our solution has not worked, what should we do?

Which alternative should we choose?

Do we have a problem?

How should we do what we want to do?

Should we do what we are thinking about doing?

COMMON PATTERNS OF INTRODUCTION