x
هدف البحث
بحث في العناوين
بحث في المحتوى
بحث في اسماء الكتب
بحث في اسماء المؤلفين
اختر القسم
موافق
Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
literature
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Speech rhythm
المؤلف: Ulrike B. Gut
المصدر: A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة: 827-45
2024-05-08
99
It has been suggested that NigE has a syllable-timed rather than stress-timed rhythm. The languages of the world have traditionally been divided into stress-timed and syllable-timed. Speech rhythm was understood to be a periodic recurrence of events such as syllables in the case of the so-called “syllable-timed” languages and feet in the case of the so-called “stress-timed” languages. In syllable-timed languages such as Yoruba, syllables are assumed to be equal in length. Stress-timed languages such as English, in contrast, are supposed to have regular recurring stress beats. Since the number of syllables between two stress beats varies, their length is adjusted to fit into the stress interval – syllable length, hence is very variable in stress-timed languages. No acoustic basis for either isochrony of feet in stress-timed languages or equal length of syllables in syllable-timed languages has ever been found. Eka (1985) proposes that NigE speech rhythm is ‘inelastic’ insofar as the durational adjustment of unstressed syllables does not occur.
Recent approaches of measuring speech rhythm are based on the assumption that speech rhythm is a multidimensional concept which includes various phonological properties of languages. Accordingly, languages are not classified into distinct rhythmic classes anymore but are assumed to be located along a continuum. Dauer (1983: 55), for example, suggested that “rhythmic differences […] between languages […] are more a result of phonological, phonetic, lexical, and syntactic facts about that language than any attempt on the part of the speaker to equalize interstress or intersyllable intervals”. In Dauer’s view, speech rhythm reflects variety of syllable structures, phonological vowel length distinctions, absence/presence of vowel reduction and lexical stress. Whereas languages formerly classified as stress-timed such as English show a variety of different syllable structures, languages formerly classified as syllable-timed have a majority of CV syllables. Equally, differences in rhythm between languages reflect whether a language has vowel reduction or not; those classified as stress-timed usually do. In addition, languages with a tendency to syllable-timing either do not have lexical stress or accent is realized by variations in pitch contour. Conversely, languages with a tendency to stress-timing realize word level stress by a combination of length, pitch, loudness and quality changes, which result in clearly discernible beats.
This approach is reflected in recent measurements of the acoustic correlates of speech rhythm, which are based on phonetic cues such as successive vowel and syllable durations. Experimental studies employing these acoustic measurements of the phonetic correlates of speech rhythm confirmed the impression of a tendency to “syllable-timing” in NigE. Vowel reduction does not occur in NigE, which results in a more equal duration of syllables (Udofot 2003; Gut 2003). Subsequent syllables in NigE are more similar in length than in British English but less similar than in West African languages. Compared to other languages classified with Ramus, Nespor and Mehler’s (1999) measurement of rhythm, NigE groups with Spanish, Catalan, Italian and French, all of which are presumed to be syllabletimed, in terms of the vowel percentage, but shows a higher standard deviation of consonantal intervals than those languages.
In general, the overall speech tempo in NigE is slower than in British English, and NigE speakers divide their utterances into more and shorter intonation phrases than British English speakers (Udofot 2003; Gut 2003).