Thinking like a linguist

Our tasks will be to explain what it means to ‘think like a linguist’ and to show how linguists’ assumptions about language often differ from those of the layperson. One might assume, for example, that a linguist would be the first person to turn to when seeking advice on good speech or writing. In fact, few linguists would see it as part of their role to prescribe how language should be used, preferring instead to describe the facts of language as it is used. As we will see later, linguists are quick to point out that the bases for our linguistic value judgements generally turn out to be arbitrary, spurious and inconsistent.

In literate societies, we are also used to equating language with its written form, and treating speech as somehow deviant. Linguists make precisely the opposite assumption, reminding us that we all learn our mother tongue at a very young age without the aid of books, and if we learn to read and write in that language at all, we do so only after we have mastered speech. As we will see, language looks radically different when we start from a spoken language perspective. It will also become clear that some everyday assumptions we take for granted – for example, the difference between a language and a dialect, or the notion of ‘beautiful’ or ‘primitive’ languages – become highly problematical once our linguistic prejudices are stripped away.

مواضيع ذات صلة

Language Mixture—Grammar

Change in grammar and pronunciation

Word order

Grammaticalization.

Convergence in the Balkans

Did we lose the perfect tense already?

It’s grammaticalization, innit?

Haugen’s model

Diglossia

Language shift and language death

Stratification and hypercorrection

Exploring variation in language