

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences

Clauses


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners

Direct and Indirect speech


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
The Medieval context
المؤلف:
Heinz Bergner
المصدر:
The historical; perspective in pragmatics
الجزء والصفحة:
39-2
19-4-2022
789
The Medieval context
Apart from the openness that is intrinsic to every era, the kind of linguistic openness dealt with here is a specific and restricted vagueness typically only found in medieval texts. First, a well-known truth needs to be pointed out: medieval discourse, which will be mainly discussed here on the basis of Old English and Middle English texts, is only accessible through the written medium; the oral dimension can at best be revealed by questionable reconstructions and will never be completely accessible. Reflecting, in addition to this, on the openness of medieval utterances, we have in mind a certain openness that presented itself to the speaker/writer or listener/reader of that time as an entirely natural accompanying phenomenon of his linguistic environment. To the present-day beholder this appears rather odd. In any case, it is recommendable to distinguish the medieval perspective from the present-day one. In general, it can be stated that the Middle Ages had no concept of itself, neither of its temporal nor of its notional dimension. This is shown by the extremely discrepant notions of world and history of this era. Thus, it is also generally true that the Middle Ages do not know unequivocal categories (Borst 1979; Duby 1984; Gerhards 1986; Boockmann 1988), which is documented not only by medieval institutions and philosophic principles but also by artistic and linguistic utterances of this period. This can be briefly explained with the help of two examples. In the English Middle Ages, there is, for instance, no political order that could claim the quality of a general political system in connection with universally accepted theoretical foundations. The same fact is supported by another example. It is known that the church service is, among other things, the center of medieval religious experience. The essential text of the mass liturgy, however, is reflected in a variety of fairly different versions, which resulted in completely different mass liturgies being used often in the very same place.
Another condition for the basic openness of medieval linguistic utterances requires explicit mentioning. The medieval way of thinking and talking is used to perceiving each detail of existence not in an isolated way, but always in its relation to spiritual values, this, however, often in free decision and with a choice of certain second, third and other meanings. In this way, it is true that the individual linguistic sign refers to a known every-day referent, but usually also to another referential dimension which is not predetermined and only vaguely related to spiritual conventions. This referential dimension is shown in allegorical, tropological and anagogical interpretations (Lubac 1959-64). In this context the etymologicalizing procedure of medieval thinking and talking can be subsumed. In a free etymological decision of analysis - etymological not from a modern viewpoint, but only in the sense of general theological concepts – this procedure consists in creating a relationship between the signifiant of a linguistic sign and a similarly sounding word that spiritually elevates the former (Schwarz et al 1988: 207-260; Harms 1993). In the Middle Ages there is no binding system regulating this procedure for all persons involved, at best there are different theological hints and practices. Consequently, however, this results in a strange amorphousness of the individual linguistic sign, both with regard to its phonetic structure as well as to its content.
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)